Balazs response

This put in to words some things that I never really though about specifically, but that totally make sense. The first page or two just felt like he was trying too hard to describe the essence of sound with descriptive language (I'm not a fan of flowery writing like "The vocation of the sound film is to redeem us from the chaos of shapeless noise by accepting it as expression, as significance, as meaning," I get what he's saying there but it's just a bit much, then again maybe this was translated?) but once he started explaining the different ways sound is perceived in film I became much more interested.

One section that I found particularly interesting was when he said "no other art can reproduce silence, neither painting nor sculpture," which is very true. Since film has a visual component that is in complete control of the film makers, the silence will always have some added significance, even if the screen cuts to black (then generally the significance is implied by whatever the black screen/silence has immediately followed).




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bio

Response - Maya Deren presentation

Student 7 Response